|
Women and good governance: Theoretical Dimensions of the
Debate
Friday
5th January
2007
Two
dimensions can be considered by women:i) the global
evolution of the continent and the role of the African
state. and ii) good governance.
1. The
global evolution of the continent and the role of the
African state
It is about
asking ourselves how to build a wealthy Africa from the
continent’s human resources. It would be difficult to take
up this challenge without the input of women, whose courage,
resourcefulness and imagination are a tremendous hope for
the continent. In so doing, two points seem particularly
important: a national or even Pan-Africanist awareness and
promotion of social justice through a redistribution of
national wealth, based on equality of chances. Women are the
first to demand increased efficiency of public services,
solutions to health, educational training, justice and
security problems.
Even if
women’s claims are clearly perceived, however, a right
perception of political stakes and what it takes to the
crystallization of an egalitarian sense of citizenship and
national awareness are absent. Most African states have
difficulties in infusing such national awareness in their
citizens. The number of competent women, who are able to
participate in the management of power on an egalitarian
basis, is still low. Various strategies must be deployed to
address the lack of competent women at the various levels
and in various sectors. Besides, incorporating gender in
governance and creating a leadership that could bring about
economic changes demands actors to conduct such changes, as
well as a clear understanding of the stakes and the right
choices to make.
This is why
the road to women’s leadership must be put in a historical,
economic and political context and also why all attempts of
reproducing the modern nation state have so far failed.
The
challenges that need to be taken up are the building of a
national market, increasing of the living standard, and this
cannot be done by merely relying on international aid, in a
context of impoverishment of people. It is such a context,
dominated by the informal sector and structural adjustment
policies, that we need to anchor in a democratic system,
where women would be able to play a political role.
2. Good
governance
In the face
of such a situation, one can ask, as Godfrey Lardner, an
economist at the UN Economic Commission (ECA), whether African women really need to go to a lot of
trouble to try to catch the distressed boat of development
in Africa.
Does the
famous oft-misused concept of good governance have the same
meaning for all actors? Whenever one talks of good
governance, the first thing that comes to mind is the fight
against corruption. Furthermore, according to a survey we
have carried out on behalf of the United Nations Fund for
Women (UNIFEM), the content of this concept changes
according to whether the person concerned is from the
institutional world, from the civil society or a political
party.
Very few
studies make a relationship between ‘good governance and
gender’, since researchers do not usually consider such a
dimension.
CODESRIA
has been organizing Governance and Gender Institutes for a
couple of years now. For the time being, both themes are not
interconnected, and the gender dimension is hardly dealt
with in the abundant literature. The question raised by
Ayesha Imam, Amina Mama and Fatou Sow (1997) about
engendering social sciences is illustrated by the theories
on governance, which revolve around some elements, such as
the nature of the state - the gender of which is considered
as male by the African feminists, and which, to some authors
such as Achille Mbembe, Jean-Francois Medard and Patrick
Chabal, is associated with political clientelism or
neopatrimonialism. However, there is still room for hope,
because, as Mbembe (1992) says, a certain number of quasi-qutonomous
spaces of expression have been created, and several
non-formal organizations have been set up. ‘A real social
power is being created, in unprecedented forms, while the
civil society is taking shape, sometimes at the margin of
the state or outside the control or postcolonial
bureaucracies, according to very heterogeneous modes’. It is
in such a context that the dynamism of the civil society,
informal sector, is taking place in most African countries.
|